GRCA Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers [Q23-Q41]

December 16, 2024 admin 0 Comments

Rate this post

GRCA Dumps with Practice Exam Questions Answers

GRCA by GRC Certification Actual Free Exam Practice Test

NO.23 Follow-up on the implementation status of the recommendation by assurance personnel is known as

Follow-Up by Process Owner

Follow-Up by Independent Assurance

Follow-Up by Targeted Review

Follow-up on the implementation status of recommendations by assurance personnel is known as Follow-Up by Independent Assurance. This process involves independent assurance providers reviewing the actions taken to address the recommendations and verifying that they have been implemented effectively. This follow-up ensures that issues identified during the assessment have been resolved and that improvements have been made.References:
* IIA Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing
* ISO 19011:2018 – Guidelines for auditing management systems

NO.24 Which one of these is most associated with a “measure of how well we are addressing opportunities”

Compliance

Performance

Risk

Performance is most associated with a “measure of how well we are addressing opportunities.” Performance management focuses on setting goals, monitoring progress, and evaluating outcomes to ensure that an organization is effectively taking advantage of opportunities to achieve its objectives. It involves measuring and managing activities that lead to improved efficiency, effectiveness, and innovation. By addressing opportunities, organizations can enhance their performance and create value.References:
* ISO 9001:2015 – Quality management systems – Requirements
* Balanced Scorecard Institute – Performance Management Framework

NO.25 Reasonable assurance is a…

low level of assurance

medium level of assurance

high level of assurance

Reasonable assurance is considered a high level of assurance. It indicates that the assurance provider has conducted a thorough and rigorous evaluation, although it does not guarantee absolute certainty. Reasonable assurance is commonly used in auditing and risk management contexts to provide stakeholders with confidence that the organization is operating effectively and complying with relevant standards and regulations.References:
* ISO 31000:2018 – Risk management – Guidelines
* AICPA Auditing Standards

NO.26 What level of assurance is required for an assessment?

Medium

High

Low

An assessment may target any level of assurance. The key is to define this level prior to setting the purpose and parameters.

The level of assurance required for an assessment can vary depending on the purpose, scope, and objectives of the assessment. It is crucial to define the desired level of assurance (low, medium, or high) before beginning the assessment to ensure that the approach, methodology, and resources allocated are appropriate. This helps in setting clear expectations and aligning the assessment process with the organization’s risk tolerance and regulatory requirements.References:
* ISO 19011:2018 – Guidelines for auditing management systems
* COSO Enterprise Risk Management – Integrating with Strategy and Performance

NO.27 How would the following test be classified?
The Assurance Provider inspects a RACI matrix for inclusion of best practice content.

Control test

Substantive test

Inspecting a RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) matrix for inclusion of best practice content is classified as a control test. This test evaluates whether the RACI matrix, a control tool, is designed and implemented according to best practices. It assesses the completeness and appropriateness of the matrix in defining roles and responsibilities, which is an aspect of control effectiveness.
References:
COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework
ISO 31000:2018 – Risk management – Guidelines

NO.28 Which of these is defined as “externally directing, controlling and evaluating an entity, process or resource”

Governance

Assurance

Management

Governance is defined as “externally directing, controlling and evaluating an entity, process, or resource”. It involves establishing policies, and continuous monitoring of their proper implementation, by the members of the governing body of an organization. It ensures that the entity is operating effectively and in alignment with its objectives and regulatory requirements. Governance encompasses a wide range of activities, including strategic planning, decision-making, and oversight, all aimed at achieving the entity’s goals while managing risk and ensuring compliance.References:
* ISO 38500:2015 – Information technology – Governance of IT for the organization
* OECD Principles of Corporate Governance

NO.29 When inspecting information, the Content Criteria provides a guide to evaluating which of these

Design of the control

Substance of the operation in the field

When inspecting information, the Content Criteria provides a guide to evaluating the design of the control.
Content Criteria help ensure that the controls are appropriately designed to achieve their intended purpose.
Evaluating the design involves assessing whether the control’s structure, procedures, and policies are adequate to mitigate identified risks and meet regulatory and organizational requirements.References:
* ISO 19011:2018 – Guidelines for auditing management systems
* COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework

NO.30 It is important to write the Assessment Report without the help of personnel who conduct the work being assessed

True. Never involve those being assessed in anything.

False. Always confirm observations and even recommendations because you might be mistaken.

It is important to confirm observations and recommendations with personnel who conduct the work being assessed. Engaging with them ensures accuracy and relevance in the findings and recommendations, as they provide context and insights that the assurance team might not have. This collaboration helps to avoid misunderstandings and ensures that the recommendations are practical and feasible for implementation.
References:
* ISO 19011:2018 – Guidelines for auditing management systems
* COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework

NO.31 Which of the following is defined as “a measure of the degree to which obligations and requirements are addressed”

Risk

Compliance

Reward

Compliance is defined as a measure of the degree to which obligations and requirements are addressed. It involves adhering to laws, regulations, policies, and standards that are relevant to the organization.
Compliance ensures that the organization meets its legal and ethical obligations, thereby avoiding legal penalties, reputational damage, and operational disruptions. Effective compliance programs involve continuous monitoring, training, and auditing to ensure all requirements are met and maintained.References:
* ISO 19600:2014 – Compliance management systems – Guidelines
* NIST SP 800-37 Rev. 2 – Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations

NO.32 Which one of these is most associated with a “measure of how well we are meeting obligations”

Performance

Risk

Compliance

Compliance is most associated with a “measure of how well we are meeting obligations.” Compliance involves adhering to laws, regulations, policies, and standards that apply to an organization. It ensures that the organization is fulfilling its legal, regulatory, and ethical obligations, thereby avoiding penalties, legal issues, and reputational damage. Compliance programs include policies, procedures, training, monitoring, and audits to ensure that all obligations are consistently met.References:
* ISO 19600:2014 – Compliance management systems – Guidelines
* NIST SP 800-37 Rev. 2 – Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations

NO.33 Follow up should be restricted to the recommendations and action plan

True. Only follow-up on planned actions and controls.

False. Follow-Up should target the underlying risk. If the planned actions and controls are working, then the follow-up should identify and recommend changes.

Follow-up should not be restricted to the recommendations and action plan alone. It should also target the underlying risk to ensure that the actions and controls implemented are effectively mitigating the identified risks. If the follow-up reveals that the planned actions and controls are not working as intended, it is essential to identify and recommend necessary changes to address the underlying risk adequately. This approach ensures that the root causes of issues are addressed and that the organization is protected against potential risks.References:
* ISO 31000:2018 – Risk management – Guidelines
* COSO Enterprise Risk Management – Integrating with Strategy and Performance

NO.34 During Assessment Planning, it is important to conduct a complete risk assessment and conduct detailed testing to understand inherent risks and control risk.

True. Everything needs to be fully understood before a plan can be finalized.

False. Limited information gathering and procedures should be conducted to get an initial estimate of inherent risk and control risk so that planning can proceed.

During the planning phase of an assessment, it is not necessary to conduct a complete risk assessment and detailed testing. Instead, limited information gathering and initial procedures are sufficient to estimate inherent risk and control risk, allowing planning to proceed. This initial estimate helps to set the scope and focus of the assessment. Detailed testing and a comprehensive risk assessment can be conducted during the actual assessment phase. This approach allows for a more efficient and flexible planning process.References:
* ISO 19011:2018 – Guidelines for auditing management systems
* NIST SP 800-30 Rev. 1 – Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments

NO.35 If follow-up discovers that actions and controls haven’t been implemented, immediately escalate to the board

True. Plans must be followed!

False. Use professional judgement and work with the action owner to understand why plans have not been implemented.

If follow-up discovers that actions and controls haven’t been implemented, it is important to use professional judgment and work with the action owner to understand why the plans have not been implemented. Immediate escalation to the board without understanding the context may not be the most effective approach. Engaging with the action owner can help identify obstacles and facilitate a constructive resolution. Escalation should be considered if there is a significant risk or if there is consistent non-compliance despite reasonable efforts to address the issue.References:
* ISO 19011:2018 – Guidelines for auditing management systems
* IIA Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing

NO.36 What are the dimensions of TOTAL Performance?

Effectiveness, Efficiency and Reponsiveness

Agility, Efficiency and Effectiveness

Effectiveness, Resiliency, and Agility

The dimensions of TOTAL Performance are Effectiveness, Resiliency, and Agility. Effectiveness refers to achieving the desired outcomes. Resiliency is the ability to recover from setbacks and continue operations.
Agility is the capacity to adapt quickly to changes and new opportunities. These three dimensions collectively ensure that an organization can perform well under various conditions and sustain its success over time.
References:
* ISO 9001:2015 – Quality management systems – Requirements
* COSO Enterprise Risk Management – Integrating with Strategy and Performance

NO.37 Producing Value and Protecting Value are trade-offs. You CANNOT do both at the same time. *

True

False

The statement that producing value and protecting value are trade-offs and cannot be done at the same time is false. In fact, both can and should be pursued concurrently. Effective governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) strategies integrate the production of value (achieving business objectives and growth) with the protection of value (safeguarding assets, ensuring compliance, and managing risks). This integrated approach ensures sustainable performance and long-term success. Organizations that balance both aspects can achieve principled performance by reliably achieving objectives, addressing uncertainty, and acting with integrity.References:
* ISO 31000:2018 – Risk management – Guidelines
* COSO Enterprise Risk Management – Integrating with Strategy and Performance

NO.38 How would the following test be classified?
The Assurance Provider inspects the use of a RACI template in the field to see how it is being used.

Control test

Substantive test

Inspecting the use of a RACI template in the field to see how it is being used is classified as a substantive test.
This test involves examining actual instances of the RACI template’s application to verify its proper use in practice. It goes beyond evaluating the design of the control (the template itself) and looks at the real-world implementation and effectiveness, providing evidence on how the control operates in practice.
References:
AICPA Auditing Standards
ISO 19011:2018 – Guidelines for auditing management systems

NO.39 Being “effective” is best defined as

Design Effectiveness and Operating Effectiveness

High performance

Getting the job done right

Being “effective” is best defined as a combination of design effectiveness and operating effectiveness. Design effectiveness refers to how well a control or process is structured to achieve its intended outcomes, while operating effectiveness assesses how well the control or process is functioning in practice. Together, these dimensions ensure that controls are not only well-designed but also effectively implemented and operational.
References:
* COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework
* ISO 31000:2018 – Risk management – Guidelines

NO.40 The parameters of an Assessment include

Evidence, Tests and Outcomes

Scope, Tests and Evidence

Scope, Criteria and Nature of Testing

The parameters of an assessment include Scope, Criteria, and Nature of Testing. These elements define the boundaries and focus of the assessment:
* Scope:Defines the areas, processes, and activities to be assessed.
* Criteria:Specifies the standards, policies, and regulations against which the assessment will be conducted.
* Nature of Testing:Describes the types and extent of testing procedures that will be employed to gather evidence and evaluate compliance and performance.
These parameters ensure that the assessment is well-structured, targeted, and aligned with the objectives and requirements of the organization.References:
* ISO 19011:2018 – Guidelines for auditing management systems
* COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework

NO.41 The key steps in the Assessment Process are

Select, Assess, Monitor and Improve

Plan, Perform, Report and Follow-Up

The key steps in the Assessment Process are Plan, Perform, Report, and Follow-Up. These steps provide a structured approach to conducting assessments, ensuring thorough evaluation and continuous improvement:
* Plan:Define the scope, objectives, and methodology.
* Perform:Execute the assessment according to the plan.
* Report:Document findings and provide recommendations.
* Follow-Up:Monitor the implementation of recommendations and improvements.
These steps help ensure assessments are systematic, objective, and effective in identifying areas for improvement.References:
* ISO 19011:2018 – Guidelines for auditing management systems
* COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework

Loading …